Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Party Activists as Campaign Advertisers †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Party Activists as Campaign Advertisers. Answer: Introduction: Australian Agency Law focuses on the equation between the principal and an agent who are entitled to work together. As per the law, it is known as the quasi-contractual relationship that associates a person called the agent who is requested to execute his actions on behalf of another person. The other person being the principal must form legal relations with a third party. Dillon v. Gange held that there must be a mutual consent between both the principal and the agent. However, in a few cases such a relationship is known as an employer and employee relationship (Robert 2013). An agent and principal form the first contract. Such a contract gives authority to the agent to work on his behalf of his principal. Thereafter, follows a second contract, which is created between the principal and the third party due to the activities of the agent. A principal is mostly held liable for the acts committed by his or her agent as observed in the case of Life Assurance Corp v. Pro Golf Association . Therefore, the principal is said to have an additional obligation to guarantee the agent for any sort of payments that have been incurred by the agent. The terms and clauses of the Agency Law have been discussed majorly under the Common Law (Donald 2013). No statutory requirements need to be produced in between the terms of the notice period. As observed from the law an agent has a few specific duties towards the principal that should be carried out. Firstly, an agent is bound to follow the instructions that are provided by the principal. Secondly, an agent should be always be faithful to his or her principal. His work is to act for the best interest of the principal and he should not make any kind of secret revenue from the principal. Thirdly, his duty is to maintain and balance the account of the amounts that are usually paid and received on behalf of the principal. Fourthly, an agent must make use of reasonable skill and techniques to perform any kind of specific task when the principal is not present. Therefore, an agent must always act in due care and negligence. Lastly, the principal must get informed about all the matters and issue that comes to the knowledge of the agent when linked to their agency relationship (Beaupert et al. 2017). For example, an owner of a car may be held liable vicariously because of the negligence caused by an individual to whom the car was loaned (Oliver, Justin and Paul Schoff 2017). Hence, if the owner was a principal and the driver was the agent, he will be held liable for the actions of his agent. Consolo v Bennett states that like an agent, even the principal is bound by certain duties towards his agents. The principal must be present to compensate the agent based on the liabilities that can occur on part of the unauthorized activities of the agent. The principal is also bound to indemnify the agent when services were completed by him on time. In case of a disbursement committed by the agent, it is the duty of the princi pal to reimburse such an agent. The principal should provide necessary cooperation to the agent while he is carrying out his activities. However, the agent is also permitted to recover the expenses that were made during the period of agency. These expenses generally include registration fees and travelling expenses (Eric 2013). It can stated that according to the relationship of the principal and the agent, employers are vicariously liable in relation to the theory of superior doctrine. This concept is generally applicable when the employees in the course of their employment commit negligent activities (Jonathan 2015). When both the employer and employee are in a legal contract, they both have to fulfill their legal duties and act accordingly. The contract formed between them will not be considered to be valid if one of the parties have not failed to carry out his duties. According to the law, there are a few specific cases where the right of indemnity cannot be vested on the agent. There are conditions based on this concept. Firstly, an agent will be committing unauthorized act if he outbursts the functions that was entrusted by the principal. The principal has the right to call the agents actions unauthorized if the principal before did not ratify it. Secondly, the agent will have no right to reimburse if it was an unlawful act, which was carried out by him. Although there are cases when the services performed by the agent to the principal consists of an implied term (Enos, Ryan and Hersh 2015). The agent will not be in a situation to reimburse if such is the situation. However, unlawful acts are not accepted. Thirdly, the agent will be committing a breach of his duties if he acts negligently during the course of his employment. He services rendered by the agent to its principal includes an implied term. Implied terms is present in the agreement where the agent may not be in the situation to ask for remuneration that deserves from the incident. Thus, these a re the basic and general rules of the Agency Law that needs to be applied in the given scenario. From the given scenario, it can be observed that the breeder and carer of an alpaca was Steve. He used to charge $100 per week for taking care of them. Steve was hired by Bianca to take care of her alpaca. Thereafter, formed an agent and principal relationship between Steve and Bianca based on mutual consent. Steve had noticed that one of the pregnant alpacas were not well and was having respiratory trouble. Steve was tensed in such a moment as he was the temporary care taker of the alpaca. He was invested with certain duties that he had to carry out. There was a mutual consent between them and an employer-employee relationship was created. By seeing the alpaca suffer Steve thought of calling Bianca, the owner as it was his duty to inform the principal about the activities (Knapp et al. 2016). Bianca was unavailable and he could not have a word with her regarding the situation. However, being an agent, Steve ensured to inform his principal about his duties so that he is not held liab le later. Seeing the condition of the alpaca getting worse, he took it to the veteran and the doctor suggested that the alpaca needs to get operated (Persson, Sybille and Wasieleski 2015). After hearing so, he tried contacting the principal, Bianca as he was working under his instructions but could not reach her as. She was unavailable throughout the time Steve tried contacting her, He had called at her home, her housekeeper received the call but did not show much interest and attention to what Steve was saying. However, Steve had no other option but to take the alpaca to the veteran as the condition was deteoriating. The veterinarian took the permission from Steve for operating the alpaca and it was a complete success that Steve carried out his duties being the carer of the alpaca. Once Steves principal and the owner of the alpaca returned to take back she found about the operation of the alpaca. Steve cleared and paid all the expenses that were incurred during the operation. When Bianca had arrived to collect the alpaca, she was informed by Steve that an amount of $3500 was paid by him for the operation of alpaca. Steve took all the responsibilities and carried out his duties without committing any kind of unlawful and unauthorized act. Applying the Agency Law, being the agent, Steve was loyal and faithful to the employer who had given him the instructions and carried them out accordingly. The principal is bound to compensate the agent, if there is no fault of the agent and he has carried out his duties within time. If the law is applied in this scenario, Steve had performed his duties as an agent. It was because of Steves sincerity and caring nature that Biancas alpaca got saved. Therefore, Bianca will be held liable for the expenses that were incurred by her agent. She is bound to reimburse Steve. The principals duty is to indemnify the agent based on the account that authorized and the agent for keeping the best interests of the principal executed lawful acts. Conclusion In this regard, it can be concluded stating that the Agency Law needs to be followed and applied in a situation where the relationship of Principal and Agents exist. As observed from the above scenario, it is to be stated that an agent cannot be liable personally. The principal will always be held liable for the activites of the agents. Therefore, it can be concluded by stating that Bianca, the principal will be held liable to pay the amount of $3500 to Steve his agent. References: Beaupert, Fleur, Linda Steele, and Piers Gooding. "Introduction to disability, rights and law reform in Australia: Pushing beyond legal futures."Law in Context35, no. 2 (2017): 1. Chang, Linda, and Jengchung Victor Chen. "Aligning principal and agents incentives: A principalagent perspective of social networking sites."Expert systems with applications41, no. 6 (2014): 3091-3104. Dewing, Jonathan. "Howard Bennett, Principles of the Law of Agency." (2015): 497. Enos, Ryan D., and Eitan D. Hersh. "Party activists as campaign advertisers: The ground campaign as a principal-agent problem."American Political Science Review109, no. 2 (2015): 252-278. Knapp, Charles L., Nathan M. Crystal, and Harry G. Prince.Problems in Contract Law: cases and materials. Wolters Kluwer Law Business, 2016. Langwoort, Donald C. "Agency law inside the corporation: Problems of candor and knowledge."U. Cin. L. Rev.71 (2013): 1187. Oliver, Justin, and Paul Schoff. "Agency and Competition Law in Australia Following ACCC v Flight Centre Travel Group."Journal of European Competition Law Practice8, no. 5 (2017): 321-328. Persson, Sybille, and David Wasieleski. "The seasons of the psychological contract: Overcoming the silent transformations of the employeremployee relationship."Human Resource Management Review25, no. 4 (2015): 368-383. Rasmusen, Eric. "Agency law and contract formation."American Law and Economics Review6, no. 2 (2014): 369-409. Sitkoff, Robert. "An agency costs theory of trust law."Cornell L. Rev.89 (2013): 621. Spanjol, Jelena, Leona Tam, and Vivian Tam. "Employeremployee congruence in environmental values: An exploration of effects on job satisfaction and creativity."Journal of Business Ethics130, no. 1 (2015): 117-130. Tanwar, Karnica, and Asha Prasad. "Exploring the relationship between employer branding and employee retention."Global Business Review17, no. 3_suppl (2016): 186S-206S.

Monday, December 2, 2019

Ms Essays (942 words) - English-language Films, Little Women

It is interesting that Louisa May Alcott writes Little Women, in which she incorporates her own feelings and experiences. In fact, Jo's character is a near replication of Alcott herself. This makes the novel all the more interesting and personal, with the author speaking directly through the protagonist. Alcott writes the novel from third person limited point of view, focusing chiefly on Josephine March. She develops the characters brilliantly throughout the entire work, especially the March girls. Each sister is entirely unique, and yet so tightly bound together through their love for one another. Little Women takes place during the Civil War in a small town in Massachusetts. The Marchs live a life of poverty with their father in the war. Through this hardship, the girls: Meg, Jo, Beth, and Amy, learn to be thankful in all circumstances and help those less fortunate than themselves. The girls are very hopeful and dream of a brighter future. Each experiences adventures and pursues her own dreams. In the end, they are still gathered as one family, grateful for their many blessings and for each other. Josephine March is the protagonist, a tomboy who refuses to submit to the traditional image of ladyhood. This mindset is radically different from a typical woman of her time. Jo possesses an innate passion for writing and literature in general. However, she loses much of her headstrong independent nature through marrying Professor Bhaer. She gives up writing as he is a significant critic of her style. The reader is exposed to two the dramatically different sides of Jo March. She is rebellious, fiery, and outspoken, wishing all the while that she was a man who could fight in the war along side her dear father. Jo stresses and works to keep her family together, becoming extremely upset when Meg and Amy become married. With their father absent, Jo assumes the male role as a father figure in many ways. Nevertheless, her flaws only make Jo a more lovable character. The reader cannot help but adore Jo for her sheer humanity, much like Huck in Mark Twain's The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Amy is the youngest March sister. She is ladylike, artistic, and is regarded as the beauty of the March family. Often fantasizing a life of riches and popularity, Amy's thirst for worldly pleasures represents the inner desires of man. Amy acts as a foil for Jo. Her attitudes and emotions completely contrast with Jo's, emphasizing Josephine's character more so. Ladylike, artistic, Amy is regarded as the beauty of the March family. Despite Jo and Amy's significant differences, both struggle to balance society's expectations and her natural, individual inclinations. Additionally, amidst their flaws, both are lovably realistic characters. Like Amy, Meg March also struggles with her girlish weakness for money and luxury. Ironically, Meg eventually marries a poor man whom she loves dearly. This is Alcott's way of resolving her problem and teaching a lesson. Meg represents the conventional and the good lady of her time, much like her mother, "Marmee". However, Meg has a tendency to conform into someone she is not, in order to please others. This is evident when she allows various women to dress her as a rich girl prior to Annie Moffat's party. Throughout the novel, Alcott presents several images of burning and fire, representing both anger and writing. Jo arrives at Annie Moffat's grand party with a large burned spot on the back of her dress, representing her resistance to traditional, and perhaps unrealistic, female role in society. When Jo forbids Amy to come to a play with her, Amy burns Jo's manuscript in a fit of rage. Jo, in turn, burns her own writings that are criticized by her beloved Professor Bhaer. Initially, fire seems to destroy Jo, however, it succeeds in marking the end of the fiery girl she once was. Alcott also emphasizes the use of umbrellas in the novel. This represents the protection a man gives to a woman. When Mr. Brooks offers his umbrella to Meg, Jo is infuriated that a man cares for her sister. Again at the conclusion of the novel, Professor Bhaer holds his umbrella over Jo, offering his love and protection to her.

Wednesday, November 27, 2019

High School Haircut Research Paper Example

High School Haircut Research Paper Example High School Haircut Paper High School Haircut Paper Essay Topic: High School The hair style of high school students has been a controversial issue for many years. The prescribed plain short hair may look tidy, but the insistence on the hair length below the ear lobe in the case of girl students, which is fixed at one centimeter or at most two, is quite unnecessary. Until recently, the Mayor of Tainan had tried to persuade the Ministry of Education to give the high schoolers the carte blanche to determine their own hair styles. It is difficult for us to say if the idea is right or wrong.So far as I am concerned, problems of the young are not confined to such a small matter as hair style; what matters is the reinforcement of the students moral consciousness, the way they should behave, and the like. The length of their hair or whether they have the right to give it a permanent wave is relatively unimportant. Cleanness and neatness is what really matters. There is hardly anything that stays unchanged all the time. Why doesnt the concerned authority reconsider th is hair business? Maybe the bickerings that sour the relations between the military instructors and their students will therefore be gone.By the way, to improve ones appearance is nothing wrong, is it? We all expect to see a new look of the young. Maybe a change in the concerned authoritys policy toward the high schoolers hair style will bring this about. {2} In my opinion the problem of the high schoolers hair style has been overemphasized. So far as I know, this problem has been existing for quite a long time and possibly in our country alone. High school students are supposed to study hard, but it seems that few care what they really want. I just graduated from high school this year.While in high school I didnt care much about my hair style, but whenever the school checked to see if we had had our hair cut I always felt a little annoyed. If anyone forgot to have his hair cut to the required standard, he was sure to be reprimanded or even punished. I hope our high school can show a greater interest in helping students cultivate their minds than in picking holes in their hair. Once in a while our society seems to be interested in this problem too, but it is a pity that the students own view in this matter is rarely consulted.That is why students often quarrel with their teachers, and this mutual misunderstanding is often detrimental to the students themselves. Most high school students do not really care what their hair style is; what they beef about is perhaps the constant check on their hair length. Why doesnt the Ministry of Education release high school students from this particular pressure? No wonder more and more youngsters in school are inclined to commit offenses. It is time to try and keep our educational house in order. 3} It is surprising that high school students hair style should become a controversial subjects. As a matter of fact, this is not a serious problem, because in my opinion high school students should not in the first place spend too much time on hair care. Time is money. The most important thing for high school students to keep in mind is to do well in school and be well prepared for the college entrance examinations. Since the admission rate of college aspirants is low, high school students should make more of an effort to prepare for it.Furthermore, the period of restricted hair length is only from junior to senior high school; if the junior high school students find nothing wrong with their hair style, why should the senior high school students take exception to it? So my conclusion is this: though it is right for the concerned authorities to relax the restrictions imposed on high schoolers hair style in a reasonable way, the students themselves should also realize that their hair style is nothing important, that when they are graduated such restrictions on their hair will automatically become null and void.Although I am a college student now, my memory of my high school days is still fresh. As a high school student I did not care about my hair style; on the contrary, I was thankful to the uniform hair style because I could thus save much time as well as money in paying less attention to my hair. In a word, there is really no need to bother about ones hair, especially if you are just a student. If ones hair is compared to a tree and ones period of education to a river, then we can see that the tree will keep growing new leaves while the river, if it ever flows, will never flow back.Youth is itself a kind of beauty, an asset, so I dont think a students hair will in any way detract from this beauty. {4} The hair style of high school students was once an interesting subject in the newspaper. Almost all the educators, top-ranking government officials and teachers said that we high school students should not pick on the prescribed hair style of ours. According to them, the sole duty of a students was to study and study and the inner part of the head was more important than the hair that cov ers the scalp.Despite what they said, I still dont like hair style imposed on us high school students. I isnt beautiful and it is unnatural. It looks like some dry dark grass on a boy students head and a very small black hat on a girl students. I am tired of having my hair cut every four weeks, yet I am obliged to do that because the military instructor so frequently inspects the hair style of every student. To me hair style is strictly a personal matter. I like to have my hair a little longer and be spared the trouble of having it cut every so often.We students labor under so many rules in school and we are taught to obey all of them. I think a uniform plain hair style is not necessary at all. Why cant we do as we like? We are eager to see the time when we are free to choose our own hair styles in our post-high school days. {5} Closely following my graduation from junior high school in 1975 I entered a college to major in Chemical Engineering. Thus I have had no experience whatever as a senior high school student. I do not really know how the average high-schoolers react to this hair problem, so the point of view I offer here is strictly personal.The main reason why the authorities want to impose a prescribed hair style on the high-schoolers is that this would prevent them from being contaminated by bad social influences. But I can cite an example to show that the length or the style of ones hair has no baleful effect at all on a students behavior. From the day they enter the school the students of the college are perfectly free to choose their own hair styles, yet nobody says the students here are spoiled by such freedom. Is this enough to justify the demand that high-schoolers be liberated from a prescribed hair style? 6} In accordance with a regulation a high school student here in Taiwan must have his or her hair cut short. Top-ranking officials in charge of education may have many reasons to justify this regulation, but the fact is that almost every stud ent regards it with distaste. We go to school, not only to gain knowledge but also to learn how to tell right from wrong and acquire independent thinking. This is really what the educators or educational officials should be concerned about, certainly not the hair of the student.My personal experience tells me that the rule governing the students hair style is simply the cause of endless troubles between students and teachers. Why dont they give the students the right to make their own decisions in this matter? If school officials insist on enforcing a hair style, it will only make the students more estranged from their teachers. We hope every boy or girl is a good student, but to pin this hope on a students close-cropped hair is certainly naive, if not absurd. {7} The hair style of high school student has long been a controversial issue.Authorities concerned insisted that the fixed hair style could make high school students look fresh and tidy. I myself was a high school student. I never thought this hair style had done me any good. When I was a high school student, my classmates often got into trouble with our military instructor, and it was not infrequent that they would be awarded a demerit simply because their hair was a little longer than the prescribed length. What is important, I should like to point out, is the mind under the hair, not the hair on the head. The authorities need not be afraid of the consequences of a cancellation of the hair regulation.I believe the law and order of our society does not depend on the length of ones hair, especially on that of the high school students. For many years we have tried to solve the problem of juvenile delinquency. All we need to do in this respect is to encourage them to give more attention to their education and allow them more leeway in their activities. To prescribe a hair style for the young is certainly the least admirable means to achieve this end. {8} I think it is all right for a high school student t o wear a clean and plain hair, but it is not necessary to force him to have his hair cut very very short.Such kind of short hair is simply not a style at all. Some students often quarrel with their teachers and military instructors over the hair issue and there are even battles waged by the students to protect their hair. The love of beauty, we must admit, is human nature, and so is the care of ones hair. In fact, not at all is the very very short hair beautiful to look at. What then is the kind of hair style fit for a high school student? In my opinion, a clean, simple, nice-looking, and moderately long hair will cut the mustard. Actually I am ery much in favor of high school students wearing their hair moderately long, for such a hair style will not only protect the head from exposure to severe cold of severe heat but will also make the wearer more nice-looking. Allowing the students to wear their hair this way will also help to put an end to many of the squabbles between them and their teachers or military instructors. The most important thing today for a high school student is, however, study; all other things are relatively unimportant. So we should not bother ourselves too much with this question. After all, beauty is but skin deep. ?

Saturday, November 23, 2019

The Difference Between Perpetrate and Perpetuate

The Difference Between Perpetrate and Perpetuate If you are having trouble understand the differences between perpetrate and perpetuate, youre not the only one. These verbs are commonly confused. The  verb perpetrate means to commit, carry out, or bring about. The verb perpetuate means to prolong the existence of or to cause to last indefinitely. Examples of the Two Words The link between  perpetuate  and  perpetual  suggests the long-term association of the first word. Similarly, the connection between  perpetrate  and  perpetrator  helps to clarify the meaning of that verb.(Philip Gooden,  Whos Whose: A No-Nonsense Guide to Easily Confused Words. Bloomsbury, 2004)This whole baby thing baffles me. I mean you have it, you raise it, you inevitably screw it up, it resents you, feels guilty for resenting you and then it has a baby, which only perpetuates the vicious cycle.(Demi Moore as Samantha Albertson in Now and Then, 1995)The blogger attempted to  perpetrate  a fraud on his readers.Every business that leaves the city helps to  perpetuate  a cycle of rising unemployment, diminishing city services, and increased crime. Test Your Knowledge (a) My office computer was used to _____ a crime.(b) The children decided to _____ the memory of their father by publishing his biography. Answers to Practice Exercises (a) My office computer was used to  perpetrate  a crime.(b) The children decided to  perpetuate  the memory of their father by publishing his biography.

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Community and its nature Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Community and its nature - Assignment Example Community and its nature There are numerous forms of communities on the planet and each of them nurture their own beliefs and concepts and identify their uniqueness against other .But a community is a not that appears on surface and has a darker side to it many overlook often times.The cultural differences and hostilities towards other culture is a common practice in many countries and less has been done to abolish this social evil. There is a considerable amount of conflicts in and between the communities which only has lead to fragmentation that unity among people. The real purpose of community and social grouping is to ensure peace rather than rubbing against to spark violence and clashes. Social exclusion and oppression in community Social exclusion is a concept which relates to a disadvantage of a society where in communities or social groups are alienated or isolated. Social exclusion and oppression can arise due to income inequality, occupation and difference in racial background. The social exclusion is a concept visibly connected widely with various kinds of social and economical problems. According to this concept certain groups or communities are considered inferior or underprivileged due to their social circumstance and racial background or poverty. As per the reading, community is the breeding ground for discrimination, social inequalities and social taboos. The very core nature of community is to create borders, limitation and restriction among people to breed animosity, condemn and conspiracy. According to reading, the communities are always afraid of its security and regard other communities as alien beings. In this attempt to secure themselves and their social belongings they consider other people around them as aliens, intruders or strangers. The author contemplates that violence is not originated without any valid reason but is the residue of the alienated attitude nurtured by the rich and wealth class of the society. The minority of people who are poor class are lea st powerful in the society are symbolized as violent groups. This lack of power and wealth in many sectors of society give way to the up rise of social inequality oppression and segmentation among people. The author points out that if a society is scrutinized thoroughly one can find a presence of division and conflict within and outside of it. However, the society projects a warm outlook which displays nothing but peace, love and harmony. Here the author enquires about the social interaction between the men and women and that attachment arises out it which gives a qualitative shape to the social scenario. It is also been mentioned that historical circumstances play a significant role in formulating social consequences which other wise intended. The Historical circumstances here can be referred to the history of certain country or geographical boundary which gives a certain identity or cultural foundation to people. This cultural identity or foundation can persuade group of people to differentiate themselves from the people of other geographical areas by forming practice and cultural beliefs. Social formation got initiated with the consistent practices of certain culture and historical practices. Social formation is a complex phenomenon and history and cultural beli

Wednesday, November 20, 2019

Health Economics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Health Economics - Essay Example For Getzen, some HMOs may be undertaking risk selection by only accepting healthy patients in order for them to create optimum profit. Some of them find it advantageous on their part to reduce services or quality of care once there would be implementation of easy savings from discounting and substitution. In other words, HMOs have always to mean business and this leads them to expect to experience favorable or adverse selection. Considering the number of commercial employees, especially in large companies, there might be great savings on both the demand and supply sides due to substantial numbers in a group, and the risk selection process might not be that tough on the part of HMOs to ward off loss and optimize profitability. This is due to the fact that working individuals in various large companies are on a regular basis had to ensure their health safety to optimize their productivity. As a result, the commercial employee benefit market in states with large number of immigrants and service-based economy may have higher percentage of insured individuals compared to those in states with strong unionized industrial and manufacturing base (Kovner & Knickman, 2011, p.33). As a result, Kovner and Knickman added 80 percent of uninsured are in families with either full or part-time workers in small businesses. This would particularly increase HMOs magnitude of selection bias in this type of commercial employee benefit market, as they would also consider the profit they could create. On the other hand, there would be more profit for HMOs if less medical care is provided (Holcombe, 1995, p.136). Considering the need for medical services in the US is an upward spiral especially for low-income population (Andersen, Rice & Kominski, 2007, p.22), the medical market on the part of HMOs should have wider scope of risk selection process and even bias at some point just to ensure profitability will not be set aside. 2. What incentives

Sunday, November 17, 2019

Black People and Civil War Essay Example for Free

Black People and Civil War Essay ?Introduction: In this essay I am going to compose a piece of text which will involve the tension of Segregation. In the 1930s, although 50% of the population of Southern towns were black, they had no vote and could not marry whites. Also in the 1930’s, many black people lived in the southern states. During that time, racism reached its highest point. For instance, the whites treated the blacks very poorly because they thought that the blacks were lower than them. Therefore, the blacks had to fight for the right to be treated equally. As a result, black people had to face the Jim Crow Laws and the Ku Klux Klan. In my own opinion I think that the 1930 was a turbulent time for race relations in America. Paragraph 1: The first racism incident that I have spotted out and chosen to write about in my essay is when the Wallace’s’ poured kerosene over Mr Berry and his nephews and lit them on fire. One of the nephews died, the other one is alive but has the same condition as Mr Berry. The reason why the Wallace’s poured kerosene over the Berry’s was because they caught them flirting with a white woman which wasn’t allowed back then. In fact, it was not even true! The Berry’s didn’t even flirt with her. They lied about it. The quote that goes with this event was when mama (Cassies’ mum) said to her kids, â€Å"The Wallaces did that, children. They poured kerosene over Mr Berry and his nephews and lit them afire. † â€Å"Everyone knows they did it, and the Wallaces even laugh about it, but nothing was ever done. † At this right moment I feel disgusted and baffled that people could actually do this in the 1930s. The sympathy for the Wallace’s has decreased because setting fire to someone is arson and that makes Mr Wallace and his clique an arsonist. Also it makes us feel that the Wallaces are black-hearted and atrocious people, because who would want to set a person on fire? Then laugh about it. The sympathy for the Berrys has definitely increased because of what happened to both Mr Berry and his two nephews is utterly excruciating and the fact that there is no reason behind why the Wallaces did it, makes the reader feel more sorrowful for them. On the other hand in the book it says, â€Å"Disfigured man lying in the darkness† In that quote you can see how dreadful his injuries were. He was even camouflaging with the darkness; see that is real bad? Paragraph 2: The second racism incident that I found very crucial was when Cassie bumped into Lillian Jean Simms by accident but Lillian Jean still DEMANDED for a sorry and for Cassie to get on her knees instantly. As well as this was racism, it was also bullying in some kind of way because Cassie didn’t want to get on her Knees but she still got forced. â€Å"Kicking at the sidewalk, my head bowed. It was then that I bumped into Lillian Jean Simms. † Cassie really didn’t mean to bump into Lillian Jean at all but she took it over the top reacted to the bump by saying, â€Å"why don’t you watch were you’re going? † â€Å"Well apologize† â€Å"That ain’t enough. Get down in the road† This right here is what you call racism. Cassie didn’t intend to bump into Lillian Jean, it was just an accident but because Cassie is black they didn’t care at all. Cassie even got pushed around by Mr Simms. Mr Simms was even sticking up for his daughter even though she was in the wrong. Lillian Jeans’ father was saying to Cassie that when Lillian tells you that you should get off the sidewalk, you get off it. The sympathy towards Lillian Jean Simms has totally decreased because what she did was just too dramatic and it was just a ‘bump’. In my opinion Cassie did not have to go on her knees because she didn’t deliberately bump into her; all that should have been done was an apology to Lillian. My sympathy towards Cassie has increased more. The reason why I said this was because she was intimidated and forced to get on her knees even though she had already shed a tear; they didn’t care, they just wanted an apology from her. Conclusion: To sum up I think that Racism is totally unacceptable and utterly inglorious. In this novel I think that Taylor was trying to put across the fact of what the black people had to go through in the 1930s every day of their lives, and how their wouldn’t even be an us our even a peaceful world if racism was still occurring. I also think that Taylor is trying to compare today’s life to the 1930s and too see how much the black people suffered.